<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Day Two &#8211; Village Day Trip</title>
	<atom:link href="http://swivel.net.au/2010/01/05/day-two-village-day-trip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://swivel.net.au/2010/01/05/day-two-village-day-trip/</link>
	<description>Turn it around ... Plain English. Problem Solving.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 14:15:13 +1000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Challis</title>
		<link>http://swivel.net.au/2010/01/05/day-two-village-day-trip/comment-page-1/#comment-2833</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Challis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swivel.net.au/?p=119#comment-2833</guid>
		<description>Mark

The grameen model appears to be a real winner which is a tremendous model in a developing nation/community. It builds dignity and self esteem which is a important element.  A &quot;Grameen&quot; engaged  community seems so much more enriched then our community which is full of opportunity and human endeavour but also dispair and a lack of community involvemnt unless it follows a disaster of some shape.  Our capitalistic ways have led to a over complicated lifestyle of enough is not enough.  Yes I am sure the &quot;Grameen&quot; engaged communities would like to have an improved community and they would say to a level like ours, but to what end.  I see their sense of community not only inspiring and on the edge of life, but I see it as a way of achieving a journey on a path to improved inner wellbeing.  Mark, thank you  for the blogs and the commitment to learn and make a difference to the world.

Cheers,  Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark</p>
<p>The grameen model appears to be a real winner which is a tremendous model in a developing nation/community. It builds dignity and self esteem which is a important element.  A &#8220;Grameen&#8221; engaged  community seems so much more enriched then our community which is full of opportunity and human endeavour but also dispair and a lack of community involvemnt unless it follows a disaster of some shape.  Our capitalistic ways have led to a over complicated lifestyle of enough is not enough.  Yes I am sure the &#8220;Grameen&#8221; engaged communities would like to have an improved community and they would say to a level like ours, but to what end.  I see their sense of community not only inspiring and on the edge of life, but I see it as a way of achieving a journey on a path to improved inner wellbeing.  Mark, thank you  for the blogs and the commitment to learn and make a difference to the world.</p>
<p>Cheers,  Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://swivel.net.au/2010/01/05/day-two-village-day-trip/comment-page-1/#comment-2756</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swivel.net.au/?p=119#comment-2756</guid>
		<description>Hi Dean.  Yep, they charge interest - you pay 1100 for every 1000 taka borrowed.  Grameen had plenty of help to get going from donors, and later borrowed money.  They are now generally self-funding (ie they lend customer deposits), but benefit massively from past support.  The state owns 5% of the bank, the members the rest (ie 8m poor people).  It&#039;s the only microfinance bank to take deposits from the public - there are loads of &#039;commercial banks&#039; here that take deposits.  Cheers, M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dean.  Yep, they charge interest &#8211; you pay 1100 for every 1000 taka borrowed.  Grameen had plenty of help to get going from donors, and later borrowed money.  They are now generally self-funding (ie they lend customer deposits), but benefit massively from past support.  The state owns 5% of the bank, the members the rest (ie 8m poor people).  It&#8217;s the only microfinance bank to take deposits from the public &#8211; there are loads of &#8216;commercial banks&#8217; here that take deposits.  Cheers, M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Brownlee</title>
		<link>http://swivel.net.au/2010/01/05/day-two-village-day-trip/comment-page-1/#comment-2754</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Brownlee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 04:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swivel.net.au/?p=119#comment-2754</guid>
		<description>Sounds very interesting, Mark. With the risk of sounding a bit naive or uninformed, are these loans paid back with interest? I imagine that Grameen would have had to, at least early on borrow money themselves - and where did that money come from?? Does the &quot;state&quot; own a piece of this pie? And why is it the only bank in the country to take deposits? Lots of questions, sorry - not being cynical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds very interesting, Mark. With the risk of sounding a bit naive or uninformed, are these loans paid back with interest? I imagine that Grameen would have had to, at least early on borrow money themselves &#8211; and where did that money come from?? Does the &#8220;state&#8221; own a piece of this pie? And why is it the only bank in the country to take deposits? Lots of questions, sorry &#8211; not being cynical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
